-
agolis
You either get to 1. complain about intrusive advertising on the internet, or 2. complain about the dying funding for journalism. Not both.
2 years, 2 months ago from Twitterrific
-
randomdeanna
@agolis disagree. information is being released from market forces (no longer scarce, etc), and complainers need to be making new models
2 years, 2 months ago from UberTwitter
in reply to agolis
-
agolis
@randomdeanna it's easy for someone to say they're "making" a new model. I'd make an exception for someone had *MADE* a new model
2 years, 2 months ago from Twitterrific
-
randomdeanna
@agolis true. Can't help but hold up @digidave for that, but still. Relying on profit-based systems is what'4 failing us
2 years, 2 months ago from UberTwitter
in reply to agolis
-
agolis
@randomdeanna Yes, @digidave can complain. But few others have made as much progress. Profit/non-profit is beside the pt, both need REVENUE.
2 years, 2 months ago from Twitterrific
-
randomdeanna
@agolis didn't mean profit in the for-/non- sense, meant it in the capitalist sense. (Cont'd)
2 years, 2 months ago from UberTwitter
in reply to agolis
-
randomdeanna
@agolis Meaning, we have to not just be thinking of funding models but production as well. Analogies to art production might be more useful
2 years, 2 months ago from UberTwitter
in reply to agolis
-
agolis
@randomdeanna ah, totally interesting. Would love to read your full thoughts on that. Have a post I can read/link to?
2 years, 2 months ago from Twitterrific
-
randomdeanna
@agolis Can write something up later tonight-- just been having that convo recently. Thinking news + art producers are in similar spot
2 years, 2 months ago from UberTwitter
in reply to agolis
-
agolis
@randomdeanna scary thought. The art world isn't exactly the land of stable incomes...
2 years, 2 months ago from Twitterrific